Workplaces making jobs fun with video games a bad idea
Jory Buechner
Issue date: 3/24/08 Section: Opinion
|
According to the article, "The irony is that work and play are strangely familiar. In games, we endure endlessly repetitive tasks (shoot the Covenant!), manage complex resources (mind the salary cap, coach), overcome seemingly impossible challenges (hard mode) and team up with (at least in online games) incredibly annoying people."
Some offices have made changes to make work seem more like a video game than work. Seriosity, a business software developer, created an E-mail client called "Attent" at their own offices.
Attent is used to mainstream the important information and filter out the junk. What if the New York Times, or any newspaper for that matter, adopts this method? What about government organizations such as the Intelligence Agency?
"Yeah, sorry, Boss. I would have sent you an E-mail about the terrorism threat, but I used all my Serios to E-mail Bush about the latest info on the sex scandal involving Eliot Spintzer," said the dubious intelligence agent." Sorry, but it sure was a good laugh."
OK. Maybe that example is a bit extreme, but communication is too important to have a program hinder it. This process will never catch on in most organizations or businesses. If there is a problem with employees sending their employees and/or supervisors useless junk mail, then fire them or hold a meeting to discuss the importance of employee E-mail responsibilities. On top of all that, Attent awards badges depending on how the employees use their Serios.
According to the articles, "Users can earn badges for things like trading Serios with a large number of coworkers or for achieving a favorable ratio of Serio-attached E-mail to normal mail."
The point of this is to award employees for doing an efficient job. Isn't it the job of an employee to work efficiently without an award? We shouldn't pat employees on the back every single time they do their job right. This doesn't make them a better employee or person.
Don't reward employees if the job's done right, but fire employees if the job's done wrong!
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 7 of 7
Jomes Weathertonne
posted 3/24/08 @ 7:13 AM PST
What a terribly written article. The author misses about a thousand complex points related to worker productivity and employee-employer relations. Yes, you can wait until your sales start to plummet, and use the information that your business is failing to notify you that your workers are underperforming. (Continued…)
Rick Thompson
posted 3/24/08 @ 7:54 AM PST
I concur, it read like he dashed off the story 2 hours before press time. Next time, do some research will ya?
Sig
posted 3/24/08 @ 8:59 AM PST
Really thoughtless and slapdash article. According to his own logic this guy needs to be fired for not doing his job right.
J Star
posted 3/24/08 @ 10:21 AM PST
This is the first article I have read online that is less thought out and intelligent than the comments following it. I agree with SIG's comment, by your own standards you should be awarded with a pink slip. (Continued…)
Charles Hornbeck
posted 3/24/08 @ 10:46 AM PST
Inexperienced pimply hyperbole. You are fired Buechner.
Kyle H
posted 3/24/08 @ 3:49 PM PST
Happy employees make productive employees.
If you enjoy where you work you will do the best job you can for them.
Too bad it's taken companies this long to figure it out. (Continued…)
Jory Buechner
posted 4/07/08 @ 2:54 PM PST
First off I thought the article was going to run with the link to the original story on 1up. http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3166471
And in my original article I explained what Serios were. (Continued…)
Post a Comment